Audit file / procedure
Documentation checklist
Head note
A capitalisation file survives review when it proves, contemporaneously, that the tests were met and the cost was measured reliably. This checklist gathers the artefacts a Big-4 review looks for, from the recognition date and feasibility evidence to the cost build-up, the useful-life memo and, for US GAAP, the uncertainty assessment.
The checklist
- The recognition date and the evidence that all criteria or the probable-to-complete threshold were met on it.
- A feasibility artefact: a prototype meeting target metrics on held-out data.
- Management authorisation and funding commitment, minuted with a date.
- The deployment or use plan showing ability to use or sell.
- The business case supporting probable future economic benefits.
- Contemporaneous time-allocation and compute-allocation records for the attributable cost.
- The carrying-amount build-up, excluding research and earlier expensed cost.
- The useful-life justification and amortisation policy memo.
- The impairment-indicator review for the period.
- For US GAAP, the significant-development-uncertainty assessment and its resolution date.
Why contemporaneous matters
The single most common reason a capitalisation position fails is that the evidence was assembled after the period end to justify a decision already made. Documents dated with, and created at, the recognition point carry far more weight than a reconstruction. Build the file as the project proceeds, not at audit.
Sources of record
- S1IAS 38 Intangible Assets, IFRS Foundation (IFRS). https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/ias-38-intangible-assets/
- S2Handbook: Software and website costs (ASC 350-40 internal-use software), KPMG (US GAAP). https://kpmg.com/us/en/frv/reference-library/2026/handbook-software-website-costs.html